How would Charles Darwin see you?

DodoIt isn’t about survival of the fittest. Darwin actually held that the most adaptable were the survivors. So, are you and your business adapting or are you heading down the path of the Dodo?

The current environment is one where there are so many changes taking place that the firm of 20 years ago will find it hard to compete. I know looking at my business and the work we do that to produce our current output, 20 years ago we would have required a heap more people and resources. Thankfully, technology has developed and enables us to create the results etc that our customers want and need.

But, there are two other components that are vital – your people and your customers. Unfortunately, a lot of firms “out there” have taken on (some very grudgingly) the technological change, but they have made few, if any steps, toward adapting their approach to their people or their customers.

Most of my thinking here comes from the “Growth Curve” approach which looks at “Three Gates” – people, process and profit. The technology has helped us deal with and adapt to the process gate, but I am seeing very little in the way of adaptation to the profit or people gates.

The profit gate needs to be adapted to by looking at the way that you engage with your customers, the service you offer them and the methods by which you price and they value what they get from you. The arcane approach that is the timesheet is becoming less and less popular (as can be evidenced by a brief review of other posts on this site) and customers are demanding more certainty, clarity and comfort that they are not signing on to an annuity stream for the advisor whereby they are being charged and billed for the advisor’s inefficiency or learning. In effect, given the timesheet places the customer and the advisor in directly opposed positions, the customer is now waking up to the fact that they want to know in advance what the price for the work will be. Those firms that do not adapt to this emerging reality will find it very difficult to retain or attract customers where other firms out there offer this as an alternative.

The people gate is the other area where firms are finding it difficult or are not wanting to adapt. The blunt object that is the timehseet that is used for performance management in many firms is rapidly becoming redundant. As an example, we recently advertised for an accountant and one of the headlines in the ad was “no timesheets”. We have had some sensational applicants for the role who are currently working in accounting firms in town where they are managed and measured by the timesheet. I don’t know about you, but if my performance is being measured in 6 minute increments, it is going to be fairly meaningless to me. I want to be judged on results and outcomes. Inputs are irrelevant. Hence – particularly with our Gen Y guys – our people want to be and remain relevant and highly valued based on what they have added to the business, not how much time they have spent doing it.

Many of the firms with which I speak are afraid of moving from the timehseet and adapting their business model to what the world is slowly going to demand of them. These poor bastards are going to be wondering what hit them in about 5 years’ time when it will be all to late.

They will have few staff and fewer customers but they will be able to account for every single minute of their day.

They will be preceisely irrelevant.

And a future Charles Darwin will wonder why they chose not to adapt.


  1. Super post Matthew.

    The misunderstanding of Darwin and “survival of the fittest,” especially when used in the context of business makes me nuts.

    Kudos for properly using it in context.

  2. Good post, and I agree in concept, but think we have to be careful about saying “inputs are irrelevant.” They are irrelevant to the CUSTOMER, yes. But they are ignored internally at a company’s peril. I may not care if American Airlines has to pay more for fuel on my flight, but they sure as hell do! Now we can argue all day about whether timesheets are the “right” way to measure inputs in a professional services firm, or whether time even qualifies as an input. But let’s save that for another day (there is plenty of related content on VeraSage already) and at least agree that inputs – however they are defined – are NOT irrelevant to those concerned with managing a firm to optimize profitability.


  1. Shakespeare was Right!

    Latest blog post about communication and how being more effective at it (which involves taking responsibility

  2. Craft Beer,The Recovering Lawyer & Billable Hours

    Very recently a recovering lawyer, Kate Henning from  Smiling Samoyed Brewery , wrote to me. Kate gave

  3. Partnerships: Lessons from the Army

    A little over a year ago, I read a fantastic book by Thomas Ricks title  The Generals:  American Military

  4. What PKFs Can Learn from Country Music

    Modern country music blends the best of traditional American values of hopes and dreams with classical

  5. And meanwhile, on the Beeb…

    Lying in bed last night having a listen to the World Service on the BBC (as you do when you’re

  6. CalCPA 2015 Honoree Dinner Keynote Address

    Note:  –  This past Thursday, I had the pleasure of sharing a brief commentary during the annual

  7. Regrets? They’ll have a few

    OK, so we’ve all got them.  You know, those things that we look back on and think “what the

  8. On Client v. Customer

    When speaking at conferences aimed at professionals I often use the term customer rather than client

  9. It’s the focus on measurement that stuffs everything

    Over the past few days, my understanding of “why” firms won’t move from the timesheet

  10. Could not say it better myself!

    Only just received the 2015 copy of the “Good, Bad Ugly” report on the Australian Accounting

Speak Your Mind


Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.