Service Level Agreements and Capacity Planning

In presenting Service Level Agreements to Sage partners over the last few years, I always believed that I was doing a more than adequate job explaining the concepts required to make them successful (three levels and a hook). However, it was not until recently that I think I have stumbled across the words that drive the concept home.

Most Sage partners do not have a specific on-going service agreement with their customers. Rather, they have a list of customers who call in when they need them. A partner could have 250 or even 1,000 of these types of relationships. Here is the problem (and finally the right words) — You cannot plan capacity when your customers are on a pay-as-you-go basis.

As I think about this, my bet is this affects lawyers more than it does accountants. Accountants have the advantage of a government sponsored impending annual event. (Translation, a tax return.) In software technology, we have no such event. Upgrades are 18 to 24 months apart and are optional in most cases anyway.

Back to my main point — You cannot plan capacity when your customers are on a pay-as-you-go basis — this phrase really has seemed to spark interest in creating service level agreements more than anything else I have said, so I thought it was worth passing along.

Sorry for the ramble, but my point was to let you know that sometimes it takes years find the words that really work.

Speak Your Mind